It is said that any line of 6 random numbers stands exactly the same chance of being draw in any lottery as any other line other line of 6 random numbers. The odds for any line of 6 numbers to be drawn in a 49 numbered lottery is 1 in13,983,816. Can this possibly be so? There are two possible ways that the lottery can be drawn :- · One way would be to have each of the 13,983,816 combinations written out on a strip of paper. The draw would simply be the random extraction of one strip of paper bearing six numbers. · The other way is the present way. (i.e. drawing each ball separately) If the draw was made the first way then indeed the odds of any combination is exactly the same as any other. There would be no value in any statistical analysis. As the balls are drawn separately then there is an opportunity to analyse and exploit the situation. Let me show you something. Take the numbers 10, 20, 30 and 40. These are lottery numbers which we shall call the ten's. When the first ball is drawn in any lottery of 49 numbers then the odds of getting one of the ten's is 4 in 49. If one of them is drawn then the odds of getting another is 3 in 48. You will note that the odds change. And this is the point - here we have a system where odds are meant to be the same and unchanging but clearly we have a situation where we can observe odds changing. Don't worry if you can't grasp this as you're in good company. Whilst valuable use of statistical reasoning is made every day in many industries there are a few professional mathematicians who state that because of the many anomalies in statistics, the concept of statistical reasoning is very unsound. Take another example which is a real clincher! There are 593,775 ways of arranging 6 numbers out of the numbers 1 - 30. There are 13,983,816 ways of arranging 6 numbers out of the numbers 1 - 49. This means that there should be a sequence out of the numbers 1 -30 drawn every 23 weeks approx. (i.e. 13,983,816 divided by 593,775.) But if every sequence shares the same odds how come this does not happen. It does happen in fact but only very rarely - twice in five years. This is clearly not an 'equality' situation. Therefore there is definitely a situation here in which we can exploit to our advantage! As we progress through the book further you will find other logical instances will be demonstrate to your satisfaction that we can indeed exploit the statistical situation.

ACKNOWLEGMENTS I would like to express my gratitude and thanks to the following people whose encourage- ment and support made this book possible: Jacquie Schneider to whom I am especially grateful. Barry Shepherd, Simon Donnelly, Steve South, Richard Wollney and Gilles Dussault. Last but not least I would like to pay tribute to Karl Friedrich Gauss (1777-1855) whose ideas I liberally purloined. - 5 - Have a look at CHART 1 opposite :- The first column under the word WEEK are the numbers 1 - 52. These refer to the week numbers of one year in the Florida State Lottery drawn between 6/4/91 - 28/3/92 inclusive. The second set of numbers under the heading of LOTTERY NUMBERS DRAWN refer to the numbers drawn in that week. So - in week 1 the lottery numbers drawn were:- 3, 5, 11, 15, 16 & 37. and - in week 2 the lottery numbers drawn were :- 4, 19, 23, 31, 42 & 43 and so on........ You will see that some of the numbers on this part of the Chart are highlighted by being bold, underlined and italicised. (Note that all highlighting is done this way throughout this book.) These numbers are even ones. That is those exactly divisible by two. In week one number 16 was drawn. It is highlighted as it is even. In week two numbers 4 and 42 were drawn. They are both highlighted as they are also even. The third column is entitled TOTAL. This is where the total weekly number of even numbers are recorded. In this column against week 1 there is only one even number drawn so the figure '1' is placed in the TOTAL column. In the same column against week 2 there are 2 even numbers drawn so the figure '2' is placed in the TOTAL column and so on....... The right hand part of the Chart shows X's in boxes and forms a separate diagram. This diagram shows us a picture of how the even numbers fell on a weekly basis over the year in question. For example, if you count how many times the number '1' occurred in the TOTAL column you will see that there were six. So therefore there are 6 X's under the '1' column of this diagram. The number '6' is shown at the bottom of this diagram in the same column to indicate the 'X' total. Also in the TOTAL column you will count that there were 9 weeks where there were two even numbers drawn. So there are 9 X's under the '2' column of this diagram. The number '9' is shown at the bottom of the diagram in the same column. There were 22 weeks in that year where there were 3 even numbers counted in the draw and so on........... My main conclusion from looking at the Chart is that there are hardly any weeks where the lottery numbers drawn are either all odd or all even. So - if you happen accidentally to have chosen 6 even numbers or 6 odd numbers as your lottery selection then YOU SHOULD CHOOSE A FRESH SELECTION TO TAKE THAT FACT INTO ACCOUNT. In other words make sure that you have at least 2, 3 or 4 even numbers in your selection. Applying this conclusion gives us a distinct advantage over our fellow punters. We must, however, check to make sure that the above conclusion is sound by checking it against the results of the first year of the UK National Lottery .- 6 - Have a look at CHART 2 opposite :- It's made up in the same way as Chart 1 except that the lottery numbers shown are taken from the first year of the UK National Lottery. First glance at the X's diagram shows that this set of UK lottery results looks very similar to the Florida diagram. The X's form a picture which is like an up-side-down bell shaped curve. This 'curve' has been shown in many lottery books and magazines and is called by mathematicians the 'normal distribution or Gaussian curve'. (Gauss was one of the first mathematicians who studied statistics and so the 'curve' was named after him.) Don't panic! You don't have to understand statistics at all in order to get benefit from the studies in this book. All you have to do is simply take notice of the conclusions written up in capitals, made bold and underlined at the bottom of each text page! Anyway - back to the diagram. You will see that there were mainly 2, 3 or 4 even numbers drawn in most weeks of the UK National Lottery. But more to the point! In the first year of the UK Lottery there was never a week where any of the six numbers drawn were all even. Neither was there a week where any of the six numbers drawn were all odd. You will remember that in the Florida Lottery we concluded that you should never choose a selection of lottery numbers where they were either all odd or all even. In the first year of the UK Lottery we would have been 'spot-on' had we taken that advice. The inevitable conclusion one is drawn to is that YOUR FUTURE LOTTERY SELECTIONS SHOULD NEVER BE ALL ODD OR ALL EVEN. This shows that the basis of the reasoning behind the ideas in this book seems to be quite sound:- · PAST results of the Florida Lottery numbers are closely examined. · A conclusion is drawn and this conclusion is compared to the PRESENT UK Lottery results. · Where the results show that 'groups' of numbers (e.g. even) behaves predictably then notice is taken of that fact to help you avoid possible errors in your FUTURE choices. So - based on the above conclusion the following advice should definitely be followed:-

WHEN CHOOSING YOUR FUTURE LOTTERY NUMBERS MAKE SURE THAT THEY ARE NOT EITHER ALL EVEN OR ALL ODD!

Have a look at CHART 3 opposite :- It's exactly the same basic results of the PAST Lottery results from the Florida State Lottery as in Chart 1. This time the analysis is based on finding out which numbers divide exactly by three. Theory indicates that as there are about one third of the numbers exactly divisible by 3 then about one third of the drawn numbers should be expected to be exactly divisible by 3. i.e. one third of 6 is 2. (For the sake of simplifying matters I am excluding the bonus number.) In the 52 weeks there were 312 main lottery numbers drawn. About one third of them should have been exactly divisible by 3. This calculates out at 104. The actual total drawn that were exactly divisible by 3 was 108. This is very close and just goes to show that the 'Law of Averages' seems confirmed. The above are solid facts! We can either take notice of them - or ignore them. If you ignore them we do so at our peril! The first bit of advice indicated is that you should try to have about 2 of your lottery selections being exactly divisible by 3. Looking at the Chart you will see that there were 22 weeks where there were 2 numbers drawn that were exactly divisible by 3. This is most of the year. 15 weeks in the year 3 of the weeks' drawn numbers were exactly divisible by 3. 11 weeks in the year 1 of the weeks' drawn numbers was exactly divisible by 3. However, in my opinion the most important thing to note is that there were no weeks at all where 5 or 6 of the lottery weekly numbers drawn were exactly divisible by three. This leads us to the second and most important piece of advice. It is - we must consider making sure that we do not include in any one line of our FUTURE selections 5 or 6 of the numbers being exactly divisible by 3. For example a line consisting of :- 3, 9, 12, 24, 36 and 48 is a definite NO - NO as all six of these selection are exactly divisible by 3. Another line consisting of :- 6, 18, 21, 27, 42 and 43 is also very, very doubtful as a choice because there are 5 numbers present that are exactly divisible by 3. An acceptable line as far as totals of numbers exactly divisible by 3 might be :- 3, 4, 17, 22, 39 and 44. Two of the numbers (3 & 39) are exactly divisible by 3. But before you blindly accept the above advice as fact you should seek confirmation of it by examining Chart 4 - the PRESENT Lottery numbers - to see if it confirms our suspicions. If it does, then we can adopt yet another valuable Policy to help us in our quest of securing a Lottery win! - 10 - Have a look at CHART 4 opposite :- Here we are - back again with our PRESENT chart of GB lottery results of the first year. This time we have analysed them by dividing each of the numbers drawn by 3. (Again we have excluded the bonus numbers) We can directly compare it with Chart 3. The 'curve' that encompasses the X's is roughly the same as that in Chart 3. But the most important comparison is that there was never a week in the first UK lottery year where all or 5 of the numbers were exactly divisible by 3.

Had we taken notice of the advice indicated then we would have been spot on! At last we seem to be on yet another winning formula. Which is :- WHEN CHOOSING A LINE OF 6 FUTURE LOTTERY NUMBERS ENSURE THAT 5 OR 6 OF THEM ARE NOT EXACTLY DIVISIBLE BY 3. To remind you precisely what we're doing here let us state exactly what it is :- We're looking at the PAST results of a Lottery. Examining them with various types of analysis and comparing the same type of analysis with the PRESENT Lottery results taken from the UK's first year of the National Lottery. If the comparison is the same then we adopt a policy to take advantage of this. This then helps us to choose our FUTURE lottery selections without accidentally choosing silly selections. Make no mistake though - we have not yet cracked a certain way of winning. Basically we're discovering why we lose so often without knowing the real reason why! Then by avoiding making error in our selections we will stand a much better chance in obtaining a winning line. Lottery companies know that we should get some sort of a win in the region of once every 54 tries. By using the methods shown so far and in the rest of this book I have easily accomplished the odds of a win in the region of at least once in every 36 tries on average. You too will soon be accomplishing this amazing improvement.............

Have a look at CHART 5 opposite :- Yes - it's the same set of lottery numbers we saw in CHARTS 1 & 3. That is the results from the PAST Florida State Lottery. This time we have highlighted the numbers that are exactly divisible by 4. The weekly totals are added and shown in the right hand chart as X's as in previous charts. Just how many lottery numbers in this draw would you expect to be exactly divisible by 4. Well there are 6 main numbers drawn every week. There are 52 weeks in the year. This makes 6 x 52 which equals 312 numbers drawn in the year. About one quarter of them must be exactly divisible by 4. So you would expect you to have about 78 in the year i.e. (312 /4 = 78). In fact there were 73. Not bad!!! This proves that the correct interpretation of the 'law of averages' is still holding good and that we are still absolutely correct in our approach! Looking closely at the Chart it would seem to show that it might be to our advantage to have one or two numbers in any one line of your FUTURE selections being exactly divisible by 4. However, the most valuable observation is the fact that there was never a week where the numbers drawn were all exactly divisible by 4. Neither was there a week where 5 of the numbers drawn were exactly divisible by 4. You must surely be coming to the inescapable conclusion that :- The numbers are actually trying to tell us something! We can take notice of the above facts or ignore them - if you dare! You can see we have actually proved that it would be foolish to have 5 or 6 of your FUTURE Lottery numbers being exactly divisible by 4. So our policy should be :- WHEN CHOOSING A LINE OF FUTURE LOTTERY NUMBERS ENSURE THAT 5 OR 6 OF THEM ARE NOT EXACTLY DIVISIBLE BY 4. Now check the Chart of the PRESENT UK Lottery numbers to see if we would have been 100% totally correct had we actually taken the above advice in the first year of the UK National lottery.

Have a look at CHART 6 :- We are back with our PRESENT Lottery numbers of the first year of the UK National Lottery. This time I have analysed them by looking at numbers within them that are exactly divisible by 4. This is so that we can compare them with the analysis shown in Chart 5. You will recall that the conclusion we drew from Chart 5 was that when choosing FUTURE Lottery numbers in any one line 5 or 6 of them should not be exactly divisible by 4. What would have happened had we taken notice of that advice? Well, we would have been exactly correct! This is because in no week of that year were there 5 or 6 of the numbers exactly divisible by 4! This must surely be confirmation that we are indeed on the correct path to a winning formula. Logically one would expect that years' results to have about 78 of the numbers being exactly divisible by 4. (i.e. 6 x 52/4). Count them up. There were, in fact, 76. Yes - our use of the 'law of averages' is working well - very well! The inescapable conclusion must therefore be :- WHEN CHOOSING A LINE OF FUTURE LOTTERY NUMBERS ENSURE THAT 5 OR 6 OF THEM ARE NOT EXACTLY DIVISIBLE BY 4.

NEW FEATURE - EMAIL US A GROUP OF 6 OF YOUR SELECTIONS AND WE WILL RUN A FREE RANDOMNESS CHECK ON THEM FOR YOU. CLICK HERE TO email US NOW!

home | concept | products | links | draw results | banners | contact | email us